Hi, I think campaining a week is a good idea. But as an interested party, maybe it is better to let others decide :)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Jorge Sanz <js...@osgeo.org> wrote: > Dear OSGeo community and charter members > > This is a reminder that there's still some days for nominations to the > Board of Directors elections. We have already nine great candidates, > including all the present Board members running for re-election. Take > a look at [1] for an overview of the nominations and support > expressions. Maybe there's a candidate that is worth your support or > someone special that you think should run to join our Board? > > The other point of this email is to follow up with Gert-Jan > proposal[2] to put a week between the nominations period and the > actual voting to let candidates to express their intentions for their > term. > > I'm inclined to accept it because I think is a good idea and no one > has opposed but also because next week I'll be out of the office for > the GEOSTAT course first here in Spain (20/21) and SoTM in Brussels > (22/26) later and I'll be pretty busy. > > What do you think? Looking forward for your opinions. > > All the best > Jorge > CRO 2016 > > [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Member_Nominations_2016 > [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-September/016606.html > > -- > Jorge Sanz > http://www.osgeo.org > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss