I agree this is a good topic to bring into the open, and not an easy one. For what I have seen, FOSS4G Asia organization is doing a good job, this is just a hard subject to address. Even if that keynote lineup was full of women (like in main FOSS4G!) we still have to check about the rest of speakers and the attendees. But you are right, adding at least one woman keynoter can make a difference.
For those of you who may be reading this and need some context, this is a long-distance race, not a sprint. Reaching outside your comfort zone networks (usually mostly male contacts in the case of male developers) to get more women speakers is not something you can do on a blink. Specially if the organizers didn't have the problem in mind when the organization started. We usually say that if you start worrying about diversity after you choose the venue, you are already too late. I will be in FOSS4G Asia and I hope to get in contact with the organization to know about their idiosyncrasy, their worries and their challenges. Trying to help from here is difficult, as my networks are mostly european and american. But still, we can work together in strategies and how to improve diversity. I am going to give a talk with Malena on Tanzania about general strategies and how to work on improving diversity and my plan is to write down later whatever comes from that conversation so we have some guidelines or good practices that any OSGeo event can use. Maybe it is time we renew the woman@osgeo mailing list to join forces? On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Mark, good on you for voicing publicly. Our ability to discuss openly is > a strength of our community, and one we are learning to use responsibly. I > saw your tweet yesterday, but find the discussion list more useful for > internal discussion such as this. > > It is a hard balance between requesting or encouraging changes we want to > see vs expressing dissapointment in the activities of others. This is > especially important in a volunteer organization such as ours where > disappointment however kindly expressed can hit really moral hard > (especially as volunteers are pulling an event together). > > I have been on both sides of this balance and it is never comfortable, as > you express in your struggle above. Ideally, I seek to offer my time if I am > in position to be of assistance and if the assistance is welcome. If not in > a position to help I seek to learn or look for an opportunity for feedback. > > I learned a lot as your foss4g event planning has unfolded and your > challenges, priorities and direction became clear. > > It is my hope that we will learn what challenges the foss4g-asia event is > facing and what we as an organization can do to assist. > > If you have been following the board meetings the Sri Lanka chapter is just > being officially recognized (and the membership shows some diversity). OSGeo > has also set aside funding for our president to attend the foss4g-asia > event. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 at 14:53, Mark Iliffe <markili...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I’ve really agonised over whether to send this email. First of which, >> being the imminent final preparations for FOSS4G taking up a lot of time, >> but also whether it’s appropriate for me in my role of chair of FOOS4G to >> offer public critique of regional events. It is in this vein that I’d like >> to really stress that I’m writing this as an OSSGeo charter member. >> >> When I first saw this, my heart sank: >> http://www.foss4g-asia.org/2018/keynotes/ >> >> Where is the gender diversity in the line up? I know that organising a >> FOSS4G is really difficult, but we need to be reaching far and wide and that >> starts with our keynotes. Potentially I’m missing something here - and I >> probably am, if so I am sorry if this is the case! - but can we have a >> rethink of the line up to really represent our community? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Mark _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
