I still dont understand why does pgRouting logo and many others have to lose the colors.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM nicolas bozon <nicolas.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have updated the OSGeo symbols set according to your feedbacks. > > Updated Preview: > https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/ > > Updated material: > > https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206/commits/d4cf2ebc76e34293333953980a38dd047d3003a7 > > > Basic changelog: > > - Removed every symbols considered as non-compliant to our brand guidelines > - Removed the Get-It project logo which is not a community project at all > - Corrected PostGIS and PgRouting elephant logos (so a bit less scalable > now) > - Corrected mapfish and pywps logos (added missing text) > - Renamed live to osgeolive > > As nothing that may considered as non compliant to our guidelines remains, > and that the first batch of community feedbacks have been taken into > account, may i suggest that the OSGeo symbols set could now be pulled into > the branding repo ? > > Thanks in advance for any comment > > Best, > > Nick > > > > > > > > Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 00:30, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> Hi Jody, >> >>> >>> Thank you for your constructive feedbacks. >>> >>> I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark >>>> was to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things. >>>> >>> Our mark is our beloved compass, and these variations on the compass are >>> meant to represent all the OSGeo things :) >>> >> >> >>> I get your point here, but i think these symbols could be great to help >>> differenciate the many facets of OSGeo. >>> Imagine a new comer that could for example identify each of our activity >>> very clearly. I think that symbols might help him to >>> understand the foundation and find his way, with always the compass >>> shape in mind of course :) >>> >> >> I understand, and indeed I assumed we would go with the sub brand >> approach myself. As such I am not the best person to do the pros/cons >> between the ideas :) >> >> This is a case where I love your work, and want to double check our >> strategy. >> >> The style guide is here: >> https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/marketing/branding >> >> The summary has: >> >> *Logos are as provided for OSGeo and sub-brands (all of which include the >>> unalterned OSGeo mark). Distinct brands (such as GeoForAll and OSGeo Live) >>> maintain their own mark.* >>> *While logos have been produced with Miriam Libre Bold and Sintony >>> Regular the resulting shapes have been reduced to outlines for use on >>> systems that do not have the correct fonts available. A template has been >>> provided for the generation of additional sub-brand logos.* >> >> >> aside: We really need this converted to html for our website. >> >> You are right, and i think Boundless did a great elephant design on the >>> old OpenGeo Suite, so i got inspired :) >>> Slonik is a lovely but very detailed SVG, so difficult to integrate in >>> such a symbol set. That's why i decided to use a simpler one. >>> I will try to modify it before the PostGIS folks complain :) >>> >> >> Chance for collaboration rather than complaints, I think everyone can see >> the design limitation. >> >> Our OSGeo compass outline does not "quite" work, since there is not much >> room for the project identify inside. I think we had sub branding as a >> priority we would of done it a little bit different. >> >> >>> - get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet >>>> asked to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ... >>>> >>> >>> Whoa, my bad, sorry ! i didn't know one could become a Community Project >>> so easily :) >>> >> >> We like projects to ask, the code and project is reviewed on the >> incubation list, etc.. >> >> >>> Yes, please confirm with the Incubation Committee about their >>> application. I see you already removed it from the website so i will remove >>> it from the set. >>> >> >> Yeah I may of messed up there, trying to figure it out. >> >>> >>> - Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page) >>>> >>> >>> Good point, will plan to integrate the Loader logo, but i can't find it >>> by now :( >>> >> >> To be honest I do not think they have a logo. >> >>> >>> - GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday >>>> >>> >>> Yes, and the Mapcentia logo is already in the set. I understand both GC2 >>> and Vidi use the same logotype right ? >>> >> >> Yeah and that is the logo of the company so ... not the best logo for the >> project? Actually if you wanted to stop by the incubation list we could >> talk to the projects directly. >> >> >> >>> >>> Thanks again and talk soon >>> >> >> Indeed! >> Jody >> > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Salzmannstraße 44, 81739 München, Germany Vicky Vergara Operations Research eMail: vi...@georepublic.de Web: https://georepublic.info Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 CEO: Daniel Kastl
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss