Hi,

In that case we should probably arrange a specific call for this topic.
I think the only working timeslot would be around 20:00-22:00 UTC

On 10/17/19 9:24 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Angelos, the board meeting is 3am for me. The 3 of us involved are in this Asian/Australia timezone.

Reese, we can get you set up with IRC (Internet Chat Relay) quite easily. It is text based only. Quickest way to get started is with the web client: https://webchat.freenode.net/

On 17/10/19 10:19 pm, rpl...@tc211tmg.org wrote:
hello Angelos, thank you for the invitation, two issues for me, local time is 1am and i have never done Internet Relay Chat. i can do skype or zoom. if you have another time/date let me know.  sorry about this time.
reese


    ----- Original Message -----
    From:
    "Angelos Tzotsos" <gcpp.kal...@gmail.com>

    To:
    "Cameron Shorter" <cameron.shor...@gmail.com>,
    <standa...@lists.osgeo.org>, "bo...@lists.osgeo.org"
    <bo...@lists.osgeo.org>, "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
    Cc:
    "Reese Plews" <rpl...@gmail.com>
    Sent:
    Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:14:37 +0300
    Subject:
    Re: [OSGeo-Standards] [Board] glossary discussion on
    osgeo-standards ....


    Hi all,

    Would someone be available to join our next board meeting to
    discuss this issue?
    https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2019-10-28

    Regards,
    Angelos

    On 10/15/19 9:52 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:

        OSGeo Board, OSGeo Discuss,

        I'd like to introduce you to this proposal that Ron and Reese
        have been developing on the OSGeo Standards email list, which
        I think should fit under the legal structure of an OSGeo
        Committee.

        I have vague recollections that setting up a committee
        requires board approval? I've found some old tips on running a
        committee here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Committee_Guidelines

        Comments welcomed.

        On 15/10/19 4:47 pm, Ronald Tse wrote:

            Hi Cameron,

            Thank you for the suggestions! I have updated the proposal
            to reflect your comments below.

            I would be honored to help with terminology management at
            OSGeo. Can’t speak for Reese but with his leadership in
            already doing terminology cleanup on Felicity’s sheet, he
            seems pretty committed already :-)

            Ron

            ———

            Recommendations for OSGeo terminology management

            1. Establish a terminology management group in OSGeo.

            ISO/TC 211, IEC Electropedia and OGC all have one for
            terminology management. The existence of this group is
            crucial to the success of the OSGeo terminology database.
            It will play two essential roles:

            a) As the gatekeeper of terms to ensure quality checks of
            contributions
            b) As the seat of central terminology knowledge for
            alignment of terms and concepts. To facilitate the flow of
            terminology knowledge to terminology authors and users.

            It would be helpful to involve representation from ISO/TC
            211 and OGC in this group, in order to leverage their
            experience in terminology. Such experience will be useful
            in situations such as alerting on cross-organization
            alignment of concepts or term duplication.

            An email list shall be setup for this group for internal
            communication.


            2. Establish a terms of reference for terminology management.

            For the terminology management group, a terms of reference
            should be produced so that the steps for approval and data
            quality requirements are clear. This should be openly
            shared with contributors so they are clear on acceptance
            criteria.

            Contributors may propose changes to the terminology
            database at any time. The terminology management group
            shall discuss and approve or disapprove of the proposal
            within a reasonable timeframe. This practice is in-line
            with the open source, change-based, rapid iteration
            mantra, similar to OpenSSL.

            For releases, the group shall convene periodically, such
            as every 4-6 months, to discuss previously decided
            proposals, governance or technical issues related to
            terminology management.

            The method of submitting change requests shall also be
            determined and announced so that contributors understand
            the necessary processes and timeline.


            3. Establish an online terminology database presence.

            Terminology isn’t useful until people use them, which
            means people need to first know they exist and what they
            mean. Geolexica is an initiative that currently serves
            ISO/TC 211’s terminology management group in making its
            multi-lingual geographic information terminology available
            on the internet (https://www.geolexica.org). We propose to
            use https://osgeo.geolexica.org/ to serve OSGeo in
            managing its terminology database. Geolexica not only
            serves human-readable concepts and terms, but also serves
            in machine-readable JSON, allowing APIs to directly
            consume the content.

            The structure of Geolexica is designed for efficiency with
            streamlined management and operations. Terms are stored in
            structured data (YAML) files, and are directly deployable
            to the website. The website operates according to best
            practices, and is served as a static website with dynamic
            search functionality. Security and performance have always
            been key considerations.

            For terms that originate from other authoritative
            terminology databases, such as those from ISO or OGC, a
            linkage shall be established from the OSGeo terminology
            database back to the source.


            4. Use an issue tracker with source code management
            functionality as an open communication platform (e.g.
            GitHub).

            The issue tracker is used to perform two-way communication
            between OSGeo members and the contributors. This requires
            every contributor to at least have an account, which helps
            minimize spam. The source code management functionality is
            used to manage terminology data in a machine-useable way.

            There are generally two types of contributors:

            a) those who suggest changes via textual description, and
            b) those who suggest changes but can also format the
            desired content in the data format used by the terminology
            database.

            People can easily help out with the former in formatting
            the changes into a proper data structure change. This
            allows the terminology management group to directly
            approve, merge and deploy the proposed term modifications
            (and creations, deletions), all made effective with a
            single click.


            5. Allow easy feedback from terminology users.

            To minimize friction in the feedback process, for every
            term offered in the OSGeo terminology pages we can offer a
            “propose new term” and “propose changes to this term"
            buttons. This allows user to directly go to the issue
            platform (e.g. GitHub) to make the suggested changes.

            A “contributors guide” document will greatly help these
            people make the proper suggestions and have them formatted
            correctly.


            6. Initial load and data cleanup.

            The initial load of the terms will involve a bulk load
            from the cleaned terms and definitions that Felicity has
            compiled. Geolexica could easily handle the initial
            conversion from table format into the desired structured
            data format.

            The cleanup process has already been started by Reese
            Plews, convenor of the TMG at ISO/TC 211.


            _____________________________________

            Ronald Tse
            Ribose Inc.

                On Oct 10, 2019, at 3:34 PM, Cameron Shorter
                <cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote:

                Hi Ron,

                I really like your proposal. It looks very practical,
                should address quality requirements, and should be
                relatively light weight to manage. Some
                comments/suggestions:

                * You might want to mention the approach to your first
                load of terms, which probably should involve a bulk
                load from a derivative of the terms that Felicity has
                compiled.

                * I suggest we set up an email list to discuss terms.
                OSGeo can provide that for us, and I can coordinate
                that, once we have agreed on our approach.

                * I suggest that an updating the glossary be tied to a
                periodic event, at least annually. I think we should
                tie in with the OSGeoLive annual build cycle for this.

                * You haven't mentioned https://osgeo.geolexica.org/
                <https://osgeo.geolexica.org/> in your description. I
                assume that would be part of the solution? If so, I
                suggest mentioning it.

                * Another project I'm helping start up is
                https://thegooddocsproject.dev/
                <https://thegooddocsproject.dev/> (Writing templates
                to make good docs for open source projects). I expect
                that the solution you are proposing would be valuable
                for a wide variety of domains, and should be captured
                as best practices in TheGoodDocsProject. At some point
                in the future, I'm hoping that you might provide a
                generic version of your suggestions for others to
                follow too.

                Feel free to add your ideas below into the wiki at:
https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeolive/wiki/Glossary%20terms

                (Maybe add "DRAFT" at the top, until we have the
                process set up.)

                * Ron and Reese, I'm hoping that you both will
                continue to provide the leadership and stewardship of
                the community as it grows? Your advice has been great
                to date.

                Warm regards, Cameron



            _______________________________________________
            Standards mailing list
            standa...@lists.osgeo.org
            https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards



        _______________________________________________



        Board mailing list
        bo...@lists.osgeo.org
        https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board



    --


    Angelos Tzotsos, PhD



    Charter Member



    Open Source Geospatial Foundation
    http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos



--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to