This article on “AI machines aren’t ‘hallucinating’. But their makers are” in 
The Guardian by Naomi Klein might be of interest . She is the bestselling 
author of No Logo and The Shock Doctrine and Professor of Climate Justice and 
Co-director of the Centre for Climate Justice at the University of British 
Columbia.



"Generative AI will end poverty, they tell us. It will cure all disease. It 
will solve climate change. It will make our jobs more meaningful and exciting. 
It will unleash lives of leisure and contemplation, helping us reclaim the 
humanity we have lost to late capitalist mechanization. It will end loneliness. 
It will make our governments rational and responsive. These, I fear, are the 
real AI hallucinations and we have all been hearing them on a loop ever since 
Chat GPT launched at the end of last year.


There is a world in which generative AI, as a powerful predictive research tool 
and a performer of tedious tasks, could indeed be marshalled to benefit 
humanity, other species and our shared home. But for that to happen, these 
technologies would need to be deployed inside a vastly different economic and 
social order than our own, one that had as its purpose the meeting of human 
needs and the protection of the planetary systems that support all life.


And as those of us who are not currently tripping well understand, our current 
system is nothing like that. Rather, it is built to maximize the extraction of 
wealth and profit – from both humans and the natural world – a reality that has 
brought us to what we might think of it as capitalism’s techno-necro stage. In 
that reality of hyper-concentrated power and wealth, AI – far from living up to 
all those utopian hallucinations – is much more likely to become a fearsome 
tool of further dispossession and despoilation.”




More details at 
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/08/ai-machines-hallucinating-naomi-klein


Best wishes


Suchith




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment. 

Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
where permitted by law.




_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to