Suchith

I understand that you are proud of India’s achievement but I cannot work out 
why you think that this is a suitable topic for OSGeo Discuss? Please keep your 
posts broadly on topic - discussion of Open Source Geo or the OSGeo organisation

Best wishes
______
Steven

🐘: @stevenfeldman <https://mastodon.me.uk/@stevenfeldman>
- Unusual maps in strange places -  mappery.org <http://mappery.org/>
- Co-host of the Geomob podcast <https://thegeomob.com/podcast>
- Subscribe to my weekly “Maps in the Wild <http://eepurl.com/dKStT-/>” 
newsletter

> On 29 Aug 2023, at 20:00, discuss-requ...@lists.osgeo.org wrote:
> 
> Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
>       discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       discuss-requ...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-requ...@lists.osgeo.org>
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       discuss-ow...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-ow...@lists.osgeo.org>
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Discuss digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. UK aid worth nearly ?2.3 billion to India sparks heated
>      debate amid Chandrayaan-3 triumph (Suchith Anand)
> 
> From: Suchith Anand <suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk 
> <mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk>>
> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] UK aid worth nearly £2.3 billion to India sparks 
> heated debate amid Chandrayaan-3 triumph
> Date: 29 August 2023 at 13:41:38 BST
> To: "discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>" 
> <discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>>, GeoForAll 
> <geofor...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geofor...@lists.osgeo.org>>
> 
> 
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> The definitive discovery of water on the Moon came in 2008, when Indian Space 
> Research Organization (ISRO)  launched the Chandrayaan-1 
> <https://www.planetary.org/space-missions/chandrayaan-1> spacecraft to lunar 
> orbit in October 22, 2008. Chandrayaan-1 carried with it a NASA-provided 
> science instrument called the Moon Mineralogical Mapper (M3) that observed 
> how the surface absorbed infrared light. Using this data M3 determined that 
> previously suspected water molecules were ice inside the Moon’s polar craters 
> <https://www.planetary.org/space-images/where-the-moons-water-ice-is>. 
> Details at https://www.planetary.org/articles/water-on-the-moon-guide
> 
> On 23rd August 2023  ISRO’s Chandrayaan-3’s lander touched down on the lunar 
> surface, making India the first country to successfully land a spacecraft 
> near the Moon’s south pole. Scientists have deployed a rover to send images 
> and data back to Earth. This success belongs to all of humanity and it will 
> help moon missions by other countries in the future. 
> 
> India's space journey is an epic tale of ingenuity and resourcefulness. 
> Starting with a budget of less than $4M for its first satellite in 1975, ISRO 
> - Indian Space Research Organisation has made India a space power on a 
> shoestring budget, achieving monumental feats like landing near the Moon’s 
> south pole for around $70 Million.
> 
> But looks like some UK media are not happy with India’s success. The success 
> of India's Chandrayaan-3 mission to the Moon has ignited a debate over 
> foreign aid between the UK and India. 
> 
> “The debate took an intriguing turn when users cited a report published by 
> Columbia University Press, authored by economist Usha Patnaik. The report, 
> part of a collection of essays, revealed that the East India Company and the 
> British Raj had extracted a staggering £9.2 trillion (equivalent to $44.6 
> trillion) from India between 1765 and 1938. This eye-popping figure became a 
> focal point in the debate as X users humorously suggested that if the UK 
> sought returns, they should consider repaying the estimated $44.6 trillion 
> amassed during India’s Colonial rule.”
> 
> Read more at:
> UK aid worth nearly £2.3 billion to India sparks heated debate amid 
> Chandrayaan-3 triumph
> https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/uk-aid-worth-2-3-billion-to-india-sparks-heated-debate-amid-chandrayaan-3-triumph/articleshow/103070330.cms?
> 
> How UK Media's 'Racist Rant' On Chandrayaan's Success Was Silenced By India's 
> '$45 Trillion' Truth
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NuD4BTcI6k
> 
> ISRO Chandrayaan-3 used British aid? British journalist 'insults' INDIA? GB 
> News | Karolina Goswami
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TrpetvaJv8
> 
> 
> This success of ISRO and Chandrayaan-3 will benefit the global scientific 
> community and it is great to see that countries from around the world  send 
> congratulations to India on this historic achievement. This is the year of 
> India’s G20 presidency. India’s idea of ‘One Earth, One Family, One Future’ 
> is resonating across the world. This human-centric approach has been welcomed 
> by all. India’s Moon mission is also based on this principle. India’s success 
> belongs to all of humanity.
> 
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Suchith
> 
> 
> Dr Suchith Anand
> Senior Adviser to Governments and International Organisations | Scientist | 
> AI Ethics | AI Governance | Policy | Consultant in Data and AI Ethics | 
> Global Citizen | SDG Volunteer and Advocate
> 
> https://council.science/profile/suchith-anand/
> https://www.rd-alliance.org/users/suchith-anand
> 
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may 
> contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, 
> please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or 
> opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the 
> views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the 
> University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to