On 2013-04-07 19:54, Mak Kolybabi wrote: > On 2013-04-07 19:25, Roswyne wrote: > > I support this and further propose an additional list: members only and > > unarchived, to discuss issues pertaining to SkSp as an organization and as > > a physical space. > > I'm very much against privatizing that. Organizationally, we try to make our > actions, plans, and decisions as open and public as possible. Also, with 40+ members, we have to assume that *somebody* could leak it out. We shouldn't be discussing anything sensitive via email.
I do want a 'members only' list, specifically for stuff that only applies to members (like votes, etc). But we have to get a better handle on our member list to do that, which we've improved on a great deal since the last election. Ron _______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
