On 5/3/05, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Time to choose how important lossless is to you, if it's quite > acceptable to lose entire tracks of a CD as "the other one sounds the > same", or "ReplayGain will sort out the volume difference" then by all > means do it, but then ask yourself why you chose lossless and if you > are quite happy to listen to tracks with different volumes or digitally > applied amplitude adjustments then maybe you should do another > FLAC<>320kbpsMP3 blind listening test as you could save a lot of cash > if you switch over to MP3 - you did do one in the first place didn't > you? You didn't just chose FLAC because "they" told you to did you? > Thanks for clarifying, Jim. I personally ripped all my CD's at 192k MP3 rate and am considering doing it again differently. The volume difference between different CDs was not something I had realized.
I felt sympathy to Caves of TQLT and as a supporter of the idea (and how it borrows from other reference counted strategies) am glad to now have more insight. Sorry I missed this part. > Jim Wrote: > > *I applaud your idea*, however I think it's more of a solution to gain > > space from a lossy collection. Regards, Another Jim (Dibb) _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
