JJZolx wrote:
peter;359816 Wrote:
Ease of use has nothing to do with the complexity of the underlying
technology.
You might be surprised. I've seen many bog-simple requests, from a
user viewpoint, that have been put off or dismissed due to the
complexity or the poor design of the underlying framework. That's
hardly unique to this project, but it points up the fact that a complex
system often makes simple modifications very difficult.
That's ease of change.
Not ease of use.
It's also not necessarily true, but usually a sign of bad design decisions.
The SC plugin interface is a good example of a bad design. The API
constantly changes and plugins fail regularly after a minor SC update.
Very annoying. API's should be stable.
Regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
