Quoting ron thigpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> then maybe there is an argument for reworking the internal operations of
> the standard "shuffle" to get this performance gain.  one wrinkle would
> be in avoiding repeats.

correct.  the plugin calls a very barebones rand() function.  it is not truly
random, nor does it care about repeats.  The only intelligence is to make sure
its a valid, playable track.  This, of course, is only speaking of the plugin.
It may or may not have any relation to what Dan is working on.


-kdf--
NOT a Slim Devices employee
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to