Quoting ron thigpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > then maybe there is an argument for reworking the internal operations of > the standard "shuffle" to get this performance gain. one wrinkle would > be in avoiding repeats.
correct. the plugin calls a very barebones rand() function. it is not truly random, nor does it care about repeats. The only intelligence is to make sure its a valid, playable track. This, of course, is only speaking of the plugin. It may or may not have any relation to what Dan is working on. -kdf-- NOT a Slim Devices employee _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss