maggior;415938 Wrote: > The problem with vortex box is that the user is too blind to what is > going on. What happens when the CD you are ripping isn't in > freedb.org? Or you don't like the genre that freedb.org has a CD > categorized for? I think a web UI frontend is needed for vortex box > for it to be really standalone and viable. As far as I can see, such a > frontend isn't in the plans. > > As it stands now, vortex box works well as a server where a second PC > is used to rip CDs onto the vortex network share. This is certainly a > good step, but it doesn't make the vortex box a completely standalone > solution IMHO.
I disagree here, you can easy interact with the vortexbox server through network share etc into dbpoweramp etc. and update those albums not tagged correctly or wrong artwork. I don't think any server is going to 100% automate ripping of your library and you'll have to manually manage an element. If vortexbox can automate 80% of my ripping/tagging then I have to manually sort the remainder that's better then having to manually kick off 100% -- socistep ------------------------------------------------------------------------ socistep's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18860 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62455 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
