My experience, in case it is useful:

Running 7.3.2 on Linux server, wired to Zoom X6 gateway router
(firmware 2.1.5 from 2007), wireless G to SB3, streaming flac and
internet radio.  After installing 7.3.2 back in March, things worked
pretty well for a couple of months and then gradually degraded to the
point of near unusability, with frequent 'rebufferings' and 'cannot
connect'. I wondered whether new software had been pushed to player
without notification.  A wireless laptop running Vista sitting close to
the SB3 kept working fine with long downloads from internet or
hours-long back ups and maintenance of music library on the remote
server.

Most frustrating was internet radio - player would connect for maybe a
minute or two and then stop, sometimes reconnecting after another minute
or two, but more often just 'cannot connect' - player would freeze and
be unable to change to music library or scroll through radio stations.
Direct radio streaming from internet to a computer worked OK, so it
wasn't just that the radio station was kicking out the connection. When
the SB3 wouldn't connect and offered the option to try again or go left,
re-attempting the connection still would not connect at all for long
enough to get sound out of the player, even after multiple tries, yet
the nearby laptop kept connecting without problem.

Just the other day I purchased a new router, Linksys WRT160N, and am
running it in wireless-G mode.  All my 'cannot connect' and
'rebufferings' seem to have vanished, the Squeezebox is working great
again.  So I evidently had network problems that were causing my
difficulty.

I don't think the problem was wireless signal strength, since the
laptop near the SB3 connected fine, and with the new router, the
strength in the SB3 player is still only 45% or so. So I wonder whether
perhaps older routers don't handle the streaming or hand-shaking as well
for some reason.  Or that the error-handling in the SB3 was not very
robust and when radio station got lost or the connection broke for
whatever reason, the player couldn't recover properly.  

Anyway, I wonder whether Logitech couldn't do something to improve the
robustness of the SB3 performance, even on suboptimal networks.  I
remember back in the 90's when the Sun computer company (big unix
installations) suddenly realized it was not enough just to list the
requirements of a proper operating environment, but that their customers
simply weren't able to establish or maintain those by themselves.  The
company CEO wrote that it was like a revelation, and that it became part
of the company's job to help them maintain those.  Logitech obviously
can't maintain home networks for people, but perhaps they could provide
a suite of tools or other robust evaluation procedures to pinpoint where
the network problems are.  

Anyway, I am glad my Squeezebox is working reliably again, and I
apologize to it for all those bad thoughts I had about it being a piece
of crap.

Swimmer


-- 
Swimmerbird123
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swimmerbird123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17285
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65719

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to