MrSinatra;628149 Wrote: 
> i have a droid x, and i have squeezecommander on it, (as well as some
> other slim apps).
> 
> as such, what role would your app play for me?  in other words, you say
> your app isn't a replacement for squeezecommander, so i am trying to
> figure out 1. if it has any utility for me, and 2. if only people who
> don't have squeezecommander need it?

I think it's inappropriate to compare two products here, especially
products which I believe are not even competing, so I'm trying not to
go down that road.

Squidget is a widget and the other apps out there are applications. It
would be like comparing Apples to Oranges.

Squidget is young and fresh, and does not provide some functionality
for now (like browsing artists or albums etc. - Instead it provides
quick search functionality for the time being). 
It is being built these days, so any user has plenty of influence on
its content, layout ,features and bug fixes priorities (and if you read
this forum thread you can see that this is actually happening). Squidget
has a lot of different layouts to fit different screens & different user
needs. 
It is still not as stable and robust as I want it to be, but I will get
there soon.

Squidget is intended primarily to replace your IR remote while
providing plenty of additional value where other "slim apps" usually
attempt to replace (or in the case of the Logitech app – just
replicate) Logitech full featured Web interface (A web interface which
is not the shiniest star out there IMHO, but that’s how people are used
to consume SqueezeBox products for a few years, so I cannot blame
Logitech).

It is however a widget, and as any Android widget:
-It is always on and visible in a home screen. In my case – it’s the
main home screen, so when I turn the device display on I see it. It is
just instant!
-You can use it while viewing / using other widgets (If you don’t use
the gigantic 4x4 version).

On one hand, I think it’s just complementary to any other slim app
because:
-It still has some missing features & functionality
-It is a widget and as such will never be able to provide a full
application experience (see first thread pages regarding Android
widgets limitations). Saying that, most widgets I have been testing are
far behind Squidget in terms of interactivity. It's just too
complicated. Try Winamp widget for comparison.

On the other hand I think it’s a must have (and that’s the main reason
I decided to develop it) because at least I feel that in many
situations, I just need an instant remote. And I think that’s where
Squidget Excels.

BTW - of those "slim apps" you mentioned, I personally prefer
SqueezeCommander, and had just removed the Logitech thingy today.

So for your questions:
1. I truly believe so, but I'm not really objective here, so I guess
you will have to figure it out on your own :)
2. I have SqueezeCommander (and I have tried other "slim apps"), I
think anyone with Android who loves his music collection should have
SqueezeCommander. Even so, I decided to develope Squidget, and use both
constantly.

I think that since Squidget is still cheaper than a pack of AAA
batteries  for your IR remote, it's a no brainer decision. Try it, you
won't look for your IR remote again.

Hope this clears it up,

Avi


-- 
ganjastone

Squidget - Android SqueezeBox Widget
http://mysquidget.blogspot.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ganjastone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3122
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=86993

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to