snarlydwarf Wrote: > That's true that it has to go to the disk, but I don't think that should > be a significant source of delay. It depends, somewhat, on how many directory levels, etc.
> The catch is that (in the web interface, when you load the page, or when > it shows the filename on the squeezebox), it does actually open the file > and check for tags and inserts them into the database. It should only > do this if the file is newer than the version in the database, though: *Should* is the important word here. I'm not sure that check is really being done. And if it is, the optimizations Dan put in are recent. I don't think they've made it beyond the nightlies yet. > Even USB2.0 is... slow. ... far slower than an internal drive: if you > can replace that with an internal drive you would most likely see much > better performance. > True. -- Michaelwagner ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19080 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
