The reliability is only per protected set.  Which in a R10 still is only 2 drives.  Consider per usable capacity.

On 3/23/06, Robin Bowes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Dibb wrote:
> Smiley not withstanding,
>
> R10 is neither more reliable nor cheaper than R1.  Nor more expensive
> really.  Also, the math from my previous post applies for why it's at
> all more reliable than R5.

Actually, it's slightly more reliable. It can withstand the loss of 2
discs (one in each mirror) whereas R1 can only survive the lost of one disc.

R.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to