Nathaniel Morgan Wrote: > Not too bad for resource use - they seem to take about 7% CPU each > (including any SlimServer overheads - I'm running it on the same box) > on my > Athlon64. Could be media encoding dependant though? > > I might try out alternative players with their own web interfaces > sometime > (MediaPlayerClassic, VLC) if I can find the enthusiasm to integrate the > web > interfaces (I'm only interested in web interface control). >
My problem may be that I've been using SoftSqueeze on linux. Perhaps it (or java) is just more of a resource hog than it is on Windows. If you're only at 7% then it doesn't sound like a problem. Nathaniel Morgan Wrote: > > I might try out alternative players with their own web interfaces > sometime > (MediaPlayerClassic, VLC) if I can find the enthusiasm to integrate the > web > interfaces (I'm only interested in web interface control). > I used to use Winamp with the Browseamp plugin before I found Slimserver, but it wasn't near as good and since finding Slimserver there's been no thought of going back. I haven't tried the other web interfaces you mentioned, but it sounds like you have a kick-ass solution as is. I think that develoment of Squeezeslave is currently stalled, but if it picks up again you may want to check that out since you are only interested in web control anyway. -- NWP ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NWP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3730 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24157 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
