Mark Lanctot Wrote: > Actually there's been at least two threads asking for this very thing. > > These were people with SBs in inaccessible locations, media closets, no > remote etc. > > Personally I can't use the feature. But I still think it's a good > idea.
First, let me say I agree with KDF, that this is a first step and a good one. I am sure developers on the SqueezeNetwork side are working on a way to get us back to slimserver from squeezenetwork. On the other hand, it is exactly those people have there Squeezeboxes in inaccessible locations who will find the new feature by itself pretty useless. What good is it to be able to switch to SqueezeNetwork, if it causes you to loose access to your library. Having my Squeezebox connected to a whole house system in the basement, I really cannot use this feature though I would like to. I think this is what JJZolx is getting at. Again, though I am sure that the other half of the equation will come eventually. I do recall Sean or someone saying that the goal is to eventually have the differences between Squeezenetwork and slimserver made completely transparent to the user. -- stevek1006 -Steve ------------------------------ Steven Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ stevek1006's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1369 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24956 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
