Please ignore my off-the-cuff post. I deleted it from the forum but once it's out on the mailing list it's too late.
I thought no one would comment on it but I guess I was wrong. Anyway, I thought they were referring to the difference between lossy, compressed formats like MP3 and lossless compressed formats like FLAC. I was going to rip them a new one if that's indeed what they said. It wasn't. It was in keeping with what I find about the company though - a "we know what's best for you" attitude. Jim Dibb wrote: > What part turned you off? Do you think there is a difference? > > On 7/7/06, *Mark Lanctot* < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > Wow, the first line jumped right out at me: > > > "I don't get why some audiophiles still think that saving data > using a > > lossless compression scheme like FLAC or Apple Lossless sounds any > > different than an uncompressed CD file," says Sonos founder and > VP of > > Sales and Marketing Thomas S. Cullen between bites of white fish > shish > > kebab. "It's just mathematics, and the results are sonically > identical, > > but you save half the space on your hard drive." > > Sure speaks volumes about their approach and why they turned me off > from the get-go. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@lists.slimdevices.com > http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss -- ___________________________________ Mark Lanctot ___________________________________ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
