As rbdavis said "I'd like to keep using SlimServer because I think its a
solid solution and has a great community, but the web interface and the
SoftSqueeze/SqueezeBox "single line of text" interfaces are too painful
compared to, for example, the iPod or iTunes UIs. I'm therefore
regretfully considering Sonos over SqueezeBox because of their
remote."

I started a thread http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28409
about using iTunes instead of Slim Server or SB remote - and I agree you
really can't compare SS with something like the Sonus system and its
remote. I have played with this at shows and look forward to hearing
the baby version ZP80 without the built-in amp.

The audiophile in me knows that the SB3 sitting there delivering
extremely cultivated digits to my DAC is all I need and so what if I
have to squint to see the text or blow it up so big it has to scroll to
show me the track number let alone artist/album etc!!

But then the techie in me wants a Sonus remote in his hands and he
wants it now!!!

My solution would be a sub-notebook (mine is virtually silent apart
from the occasional whir - perhaps a 'dum' or 'slim client' device
would be better with no HD or whirring bits!) on the coffee table,
running iTunes and all it's great graphical ways of choosing what you
want to hear (love the cover art scrolling view - you get a pretty
picture of whats playing!). Then all thats needed is a NAS with your
files on it and some way of making Slimserver play what iTunes tells it
to - pity you can't just use iTunes as a server and forget about Slim
Server (Roku I think manage this trick?)

.


-- 
Timbo
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timbo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=933
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27824

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to