On 12/11/06, ezkcdude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter, thanks for not attacking me as the others have. I just want to point out again, I am suggesting the *addition* of a feature, not taking away the server/client architecture. It must be possible to add a standalone mode. It's just a matter of cost. If the cost is too high, then it's not going to happen. I understand that completely. Where I disagree with the others is that I am not assuming -a priori- that the cost will be so high.
I'm sorry that you feel attacked, that's not my intention. I don't like your idea because I doubt its utility and practicality, but I'm sure you're a fine person. -- "I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin, So across the Western ocean I must wander" -- traditional _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
