On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:59 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> we are working on this, but one of the questions that came up is 'how do
> other companies deal with this', which is why I am asking the list.
>

For the "we need it right now" issues we will generally do it, but
with admonishment and some arm-waving.  For repeated offenses of
failure to bring in the right resources in a timely fashion, requests
are made at upper level management to have their staff play nicer with
the other kids.  The nuclear option is always to say "no, you need to
wait for our change control process, kthxbai"

To me it sounds like your being bitten by two things:
- outside parties nickle-and-diming you to death due to lack of
advance notice and then complain because you're holding up their work.
 That's a social problem and technology won't fix it  in total.  It
sounds like this is something where sitting down and doing some
expectation management would be highly beneficial.  I suggest finding
the 5 worst offenders, talk to 'em and show them the metrics.  If that
doesn't work give the metrics to your upper management to show to
their upper management and insist that your group be brought in sooner
in the project's life.  Often, when getting down to the root of issues
like this, I've found that that root cause is a poorly communicated
policy from a ill-informed staffer being poorly encoded in a
doc/guide/howto of the other group.  Clearing up that misinformation
helps everyone.

- Your tools need some lovin' to make your life easier.  Depending on
your environment and what kind of glue you already have, addressing
this might have less return than hiring dedicated minion to reduce the
load.  It also sounds like you have really good metrics, so you may be
able to make the case for funding to offload some of your tasks for a
long enough time to have the slack to address the issues.  It's hard
to ignore an argument that says "we spend $x/transaction and if we
invest $y over the next 6 months we can get that down to $x-z which
will payback that investment in less than 2 quarters after completion"

-n
-- 
-------------------------------------------
nathan hruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
metaphysically wrinkle-free
-------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to