On 7/6/10 9:48 PM, Adam Levin wrote: > We have one in our lab with about 50TB of storage on it right now (four > shelves, and I believe the breakdown is 1 shelf each of 450GB 15k FC, > 300GB 15k FC, 500GB 7200rpm SATA and 1TB 7200rpm SATA, but I could be > off). We purchased two shelves initially, and added two more later, > which is why we have larger drives in the two newer shelves. > > We don't use it specifically for MS SQL -- in the lab it's used for > everything from Oracle and MS SQL to VMWare, mostly through an IBM SVC. > > We would be very happy if the production data centers adopted Compellent > -- we love the thing. Our database people were skeptical, but so far > have been very impressed with the tests they've run against it (though, > again, those are through an SVC, not direct to the unit). > > It's a pretty amazing piece of technology, and we often wonder why it > took so long for a company to finally do it. It makes storage > administration very, very simple, and it works very well. > > -Adam
Appreciate your info. Do you happen to know what kind of throughput you're getting on the SAN? Ryan _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
