On Apr 6, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
Clearly I'm not thinking along the same lines as others here then. If one is running Windows, is it not simpler to make the switch by having two machines ... one running each platform? I confess, I found it easy that way. But it's true, we're all different.
Maybe. Problem is, owning/maintaining two machines is going to be significantly more expensive and less convenient - particularly if you require portability. As you suggest, the dual-boot option is not for everybody but it's pretty clear after a quick google search and the traffic on this list that plenty of folks *do* want and/or need the option.
Joe
