Actually, you summed up the points quite well. I am normally rushed for time and either don't quite hit the nail on the head or I spend ten paragraphs saying what could be accomplished in 1. In fact, I learned a lot from your post, as I tend to do from the better technically versed on this list.
I just have had too many years on email lists and three as a moderator on two forums to have become accustomed to the discussion that will go nowhere. I had a very kind forum administrator lecture me on the finer points of the signs of trolling, and it can be applied to email lists as well. My mistake was initially not hitting the delete key when my experience told me to do so, and, instead, responded. You can't win against one who tries to defend the indefensible...one of my friend's most useful points in that lecture. John D. Panarese Managing Director Technologies for the Visually Impaired, Inc. 9 Nolan Court Hauppauge, NY 11788 Tel/Fax, (631) 724-4479 Email, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet, http://www.tvi-web.com AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTORS FOR PORTSET SYSTEMS LTD, COMPSOLUTIONS VA, PREMIER ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INDEX, PAPENMEIER, REPRO-TRONICS, PULSEDATA, DUXBURY, DANCING DOTS, ROBOTRON AND OTHER PRODUCTS FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Access Curmudgeon Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 9:58 PM To: General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by the blind Subject: Re: Re: game over On 4/8/06, John Panarese wrote: > I have plenty of articles also indicating these facts, but I felt it > wasn't worth the trouble trying to debate this with the message sender in > question. I've been on lists long enough to realize that it would be a > pointless argument that would only perpetuate his enjoyment in list > controversy. John, your prescience on this point has been nicely proven! Abdul has demonstrated that his ignorance and disassembly is willful, so I will not burden the list with further chatter. I thought it important that his assertions not go unchallenged less some innocent attribute validity to them. My rebuttal stands up despite his further protestations, so I will not be bothered to rebuttal his rebuttal to my rebuttal!
