I'm still trying to figure out exactly what the response was
supposed to mean. I believe in the overall scheme of things or in
the big picture, AC is correct. Software can have some hefty mark
up, but that depends on the package in question and I think the
hardware margin for systems is greater. However, this is, as stated,
off topic and an unnecessary debate.
John D. Panarese
Managing Director
Technologies for the Visually Impaired, Inc.
9 Nolan Court
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Tel/Fax, (631) 724-4479
Email, [EMAIL PROTECTED] net
Internet, http://www.tvi-web.com
AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTORS FOR PORTSET SYSTEMS LTD, COMPSOLUTIONS VA,
PREMIER ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INDEX, PAPENMEIER, REPRO-TRONICS,
DUXBURY, DANCING DOTS AND OTHER PRODUCTS FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY
IMPAIRED
AUTHORIZED APPLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATE
MAC VOICEOVER TRAINING AND SALES
On Aug 29, 2006, at 6:57 AM, David Poehlman wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Abdul Kamara wrote:
Apple makes money selling hardware, the profit on OS X is really
pretty
marginal compared to that, although I am sure it pays for itself.
Umm, either you got the above from someone who pulled it from their
bum, or
you pulled it from your own.
Abdul
