I had been using bootcamp because I knew it would work.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Grady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by 
theblind" <discuss@macvisionaries.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: my fusion experiences:


Why did you decide to install bootcamp?
On Nov 20, 2007, at 6:58 PM, David Poehlman wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I thought some might find interesting the experiences I've gained by
> installing and attempting to use fusion on my imac and macbook.  I
> decided
> after going through this that fusion and most likely paralells is
> not for
> me.
>
> I first installed it on my Macbook using bootcamp as the virtual
> machine.
> After a lot of trial and error, I realized that I was not going to
> get jaws
> activated nor was I going to settle the video intercept issue.  I
> have to
> day though that I was favorably impressed with the ease of use and
> accessibility of the vmware interface considering the complexity of
> the job
> it has to do .
>
> I then proceeded to install it on my Imac this is a core2 duo
> 2.16ghz system
> with 3gb of ram and an 500gb hd.  Again, I was impressed with the
> interface
> and also on both the speed of the final product although I didn't
> perform
> any heavy tasks.  I was not impressed though by the number of
> drivers I had
> to reinstall and that I had to reinstall them each time I shut down
> and
> restarted the vm.  I guess without jaws in the mix, and a bit of
> tinkering,
> this could be a good solution.  I only tried it ow because I needed
> a more
> efficient environment in which to work, but I'll settle for two
> computers
> one for the windows side of the project and the other for the Mac
> side of
> it.
>
> Lastly, be warened, you will find your self having to reactivate
> windows if
> you use fusion after installing windows through bootcamp and if you
> decide
> you want to just boot into windows directly, another activation and
> then if
> you want to use fusion again, another activation...
>
>




Reply via email to