mine might have been one of the later models. It's a titanium seemingly the only one on the list.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:14 AM Subject: Re: Diference between Mac Book and Mac Book Pro David, that was what I had heard from one of the techs at my office. I never had such a unit to verify if that was the case or not. I can't imagine Apple releasing a product if that were the case and that would surely show up in testing. On Sep 16, 2008, at 8:14 AM, David Poehlman wrote: > I didn't have any problems with my G4 titanium's airport. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS > X by > theblind" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 8:04 PM > Subject: Re: Diference between Mac Book and Mac Book Pro > > > Yes, that is true Cara, they will be moving to Aluminum. I knew they > had used Titanium, but wasn't sure if that was still the case > considering the first such units and this was back in the G4 days, had > problems with the AirPort cards or so I was told. > Apparently the entire move to Aluminum is for environmental reasons. I > have to admit, I do like the Aluminum chassis of my iMac. > > On Sep 15, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Cara Quinn wrote: > >> Scott, in my understanding, the current MacBook models still use a >> titanium chassis with a polycarbonate shell. I've also heard that >> the newer MBs will be moving to aluminum though so we'll see!… >> >> Smiles, >> >> Cara :) > > > > > Scott Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
