hmm, does control conflict with window eyes?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Esther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by 
theblind" <discuss@macvisionaries.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: webkit


The problem with WebKit's changing the access key combination from
Control to the VoiceOver keys of Control and Option was that they
weren't aware that these keys were being used by VoiceOver.  The
response was:
"There is no doubt that we need to resolve the conflict with
VoiceOver, now that we know about it."
And as Jacob states, the WebKit folks plan to change the access key
back to the Control key, but this hasn't made it into the nightly
builds yet.
Cheers,
Esther

On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Jacob Schmude wrote:

> Well, not strictly true. You can use VO's passthrough key (vo+tab)
> and still use the access keys. It's still annoying even if it's
> useable.
>
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2008, at 20:44, Dan Eickmeier wrote:
>
>> Hopefully the webkit developers can be made aware that control
>> option can't  be used for access keys due to it being used for VO,
>> On Nov 19, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Jacob Schmude wrote:
>>
>>> Well, a simple platform check could work around that. Apparently
>>> they do plan to do this, so that if it's on Mac it's just the ctrl
>>> key like it used to be. As far as I know they haven't done it yet
>>> though.
>>> I know exactly where it came from, as even when Webkit exposes the
>>> access keys to VO it calls the option key the alt key. It's kind
>>> of funny to here voice over say "search, ctrl+alt+f." Still, I'm
>>> not sure how this one got passed the webkit accessibility folks.
>>> Ah well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 19, 2008, at 14:17, Chris Blouch wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is probably a holdover from Windows where nearly every key
>>>> combination is used by either the OS, browser or AT like Jaws
>>>> except the control+alt set.
>>>>
>>>> CB
>>>>
>>>> Jacob Schmude wrote:
>>>>> Hi Esther
>>>>> Actually ,they do work, but there as been a change in the Webkit
>>>>> code base. For access keys, you must now press ctrl+option and
>>>>> the letter. Needless to say this is annoying as all get out, as
>>>>> it interferes with just about every Voiceover key combination
>>>>> around.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 14, 2008, at 19:58, Esther wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, if you start up WebKit it will look as though Safari is
>>>>>> running, except that things like VO-Shift-M on Web page links
>>>>>> will bring up the contextual menu and other such fixes.  You
>>>>>> really are running Safari, but the underlying engine powering
>>>>>> it has some fixes.  On the slightly negative side (for me), the
>>>>>> access keys for the Mail Archive site for this list at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@macvisionaries.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> don't work under WebKit right now, so I can't use Control-I to
>>>>>> shift the list of posts to a set of links indexed by date, and
>>>>>> Control-C to shift the listing back to links ordered by content
>>>>>> into threads.  (Or navigate through threads to read the next
>>>>>> post with Control-n and the previous post with Control-p; or
>>>>>> use the analogous commands of Control-f and Control-b to move
>>>>>> forwards or back by date).  This went away in September, but
>>>>>> the fix will appear in an upcoming WebKit build.  Until then, I
>>>>>> fire up Safari to read and search the Mailing List archives for
>>>>>> this list, but use WebKit for most everything else web-related.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Esther
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 14, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Mike Arrigo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone. I decided to give the latest nightly build of web
>>>>>>> kit a try, one thing I noticed, when running the webkit
>>>>>>> application, it shows as safari, and even calls itself safari
>>>>>>> 3.1, is safari still loading but using the newer web kit
>>>>>>> engine instead? So far, it's working really well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>




Reply via email to