On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 15:09 -0600, Peter Kupfer wrote:
> What is beginning to baffle me, is why we even have file titles. They > serve no purpose other than as a field, and we already have a field tool. I have not researched this, but I've got my theory. I think you will not like it though: 1. We've got titles because MS Word has them 2. MS Word has titles because once upon a time, when competing products to Windows had long filenames with spaces, and without ugly extensions, Microsoft wanted to have a stop-gap solution to help users who were confused when they had hundreds of documents named LETRRAL.DOX, LETR1V2.DOC, NEWLETR.DOC or similar. Therefore they came up with "Document Titles". > This is a place where we could easily and practically eliminate a > preference or option. Any day ; ) (unfortunately I think they are needed for Word interoperability nowadays) /ralph -- Rettet die Wale und stÃrzt das System, und trennt euren MÃll, denn viel Mist ist nicht schÃn! Gustav, "Rettet die Wale" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]