On Fri, May 20, 2005 22:44:01 PM +0200, Mathias Bauer
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So a reliable port for the "document" macros means reimplementing
> more or less the whole API.
Where is it documented, and which is the corresponding mailing list?
> From the investigations we did on the
> integration of VBA macros into OOo I'd say doing the same for OOo
> macros into other office programs is nothing I'd recommend.
Why, exactly? May I ask you to elaborate on this?
> Your comparison with the browser case is IMHO not correct, because what
> you have described as "macros in documents" fits better to Javascript
> than to a Java Applet.
That is the same thing I intended, sorry if I made confusion.
> I think what you want is a portable, standardized function set for a
> well defined scope (like JavaScript, but referred to Office
> documents).
Exactly, thanks for helping me to word it better. Any comment or wish
about what this function set would be?
TIA,
Marco
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
The worst thing one can do is not to try, to be aware of what one
wants and not give in to it, to spend years in silent hurt wondering
if something could have materialized -- and never knowing. --
David Viscott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
