On Mon, May 30, 2005 16:39:12 PM -0700, Chris BONDE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2005 13:43:46 PM -0400, Daniel Carrera > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Absolutely yes. That's copyright realm. But inventions and patents are > > different. If you come to my home, see my half dome photograph, and > > inspired by that go to Yosemite to make much better ones, none of us > > can and should pretend anything on the work of the other. I agree > > 100%. But if I had finished yesterday, after years of labor, the > > formula for the film you used, maybe spending a lot of money, you > > copied the formula today and, without even really understanding it, > > began to sell tomorrow films at a cheaper price because you have no > > R&D costs to recover, I'd be mightily pissed. That's why patents were > > invented. > I like the last sentence LOL, also the reference of 'That's" FOTFL
What do you mean with "also the reference of "That's"? Marco -- Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/ [media giants] have no idea how to do business with resourceful human beings rather than passive vegetables. So they run to [the] government for protection." -- Doc Searls on the SSSCA, in Linux Journal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
