Chad Smith wrote:
On 7/7/05, Peter Kupfer OOo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, if the dislikes are the same as 1.1.4, why no A-list?
Prolly because they thought that a major release should be, well, a
major improvement. Templates from MSO 97 and MSO Xp are not the same.
They improved. They gave more. Same with Xp to 2003. For example,
some people complain because Windows XP has many of the same problems
as Windows ME. Well, if it worked in ME, why change it? Because you
expect things to get better. What was "the best of the best" last
year may not be good enough to be the "best of the best" this year.
For arguments sake, OOo 2.0 does have a lot of improvements. It just
seems stupid to me, not your fault obviously, that if 1.1.4 was A list
then 2.0 should be A-list too.
Have a good one,
--
Peter Kupfer -- Using OOo since 'OO4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to help? http://www.oooauthors.org
For OOo tips: http://openoffice.peschtra.com/ooo_tips_tricks.html
To order OOo: http://openoffice.peschtra.com/distro/ooo_distro.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
