Quoting CPHennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sunday 07 August 2005 13:08, + J. Greenlees wrote: > > [ MODERATED ] *********************** > > why is it default to intel? > > since hp ( amongst other manufacturers ) has for years been standardised > > with amd, there is an equal number of win32 systems that would get a more > > stable working environment with an amd specific build. > > > > noticed the intel in the version name when downloading the 1.9.x beta > just > > now. > > Hi Jaqui, > You will find that any OOo package with the name "intel" in it should work > > perfectly on AMD cpus. If they do not, then there is a bug and it should be > > reported. > > Please reply to discuss@openoffice.org only >
I've not had any problems with OO, even with the beta for version 2 ( other than installing the rpms into a mandrake box.. mandrake's menus screw the menu entries for it. [ not an open office bug ] ) since the win32 build is architecture independent, shouldn't the installer name indicate it? it's the intel that raises the question re stability on amd systems. I know that with a 64 bit system the differences are greater, making an architecture independent build a huge one. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Voice Messages, Voice Calls (VoIP), Video Conferencing, http://www.x-mail.net Anonymous SSL Web Surfing, http://www.snoopblocker.com Search http://www.teradex.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
