Steve Kopischke wrote:
on 11/02/05 08:57 'mark' wrote:
Randomthots wrote:
<snip>
What *I* get annoyed at is the attitude that just because some people in the world pay for Internet by the byte, that it's somehow wrong in principle to *ever* use technology like html e-mail. What if I want
<snip>
Hey, great way to spread viruses and worms! Go for it! Of course,
<snip>
    mark "all* my email is ascii plaintext"

Yikes, mark - what got your undies in a bundle? Just because a rather Luddite approach to e-mail formatting is right for you, don't presume that it is right to everyone.

Luddite means against all technology, or most advances. I've been doing email for 15 years, and see ->no reason<- for HTML email. Further, you seem to ignore my main complaint... unless you didn't understand it. Look, HTML spammail frequently includes executables, or links to sites where, if you don't have it turned off, your mailtool will download, on the fly, a graphic (or whatever) from a site. This is a very common means of spreading worms and viruses.

Oh, and "luddite"? I'm a Unix/Linux software developer, Unix/Linux sysadmin, and software configuration, build and release manager (when I'm working, not job hunting), and have been working in the field for more than two dozen years.

I, too, prefer to be able to include a bit of HTML formatting in *some* e-mail messages. Sometimes, a bit of style can carry the content's

I correspond with a lot of folks, and my wife, who's on a larger number of mailing lists, does a lot more, and neither of us feels any need for HTML email, and no one seems to not understand us, unless we haven't phrased something correctly. Seriously, have you had any trouble understanding any of my posts, where I've used what have been 'Net standards for 20+ years - the caps, the surrounded by asterisks, etc? (And I got tired of smileys ten years ago, so I went to the alternative <g>)

intended meaning much more easily than a clumsy smiley. Also, a number of the e-mail newsletters I receive are formatted to resemble the Web pages that spawned them. A nice bit of brand bundling that actually

That, I hate. Email is not a Website - you want the Website, go there! A far better answer is, for example, the emails I get from Truthout.org, or the way I send out story links to lists: A headline, a paragraph, so that the recipient can decide for themselves if they want to read more, and a link. They want the whole thing, they can go there, and see it in all it's Web-glory.

Next you'll tell us that you have javascript, etc, enabled for your email.... <shudder>

makes the messages easier to read.

Pardon? The only thing that I find makes messages easier to read is when someone knows how to format paragraphs (not a problem on this list), as opposed to four or five inches on my screen of run-on sentences. (And when I see that in a job description!)

        mark
--
"One of the greatest tragedies in human history was the hijacking of morality by religion." - Sir Arthur C. Clarke

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to