On Mon January 2 2006 14:31, + Henrik Eismark wrote: > [ MODERATED ] *********************** > > > Thanks for your open mindedness and your understanding. > > No reason to introduce sarcams because I reject a proposal. > Not every proposal can be the best solution. It's impossible > You getting hit is a statistical conincidence. > > >> If you did not fully understand my suggestion then I could have told you > > > > that this is a macro which could be developed to provide the > > functionality you are interested in and it could then be installed by any > > use, similar to many other macros available today. > > I understood that you should create a macro. I didn't agree it was a simple > and easy matter that everybody could apply. If it was as easy as you > mention, it could be introduced by default and I sugges it is done by a > field in the bar. Why not just admit my soulution IS the simplest?? Do you > get offended by a rejected proposal not matter how inventive and clever it > is?
Please subscribe to the discuss@openoffice.org if you want to continue this discussion. -- CPH : OpenOffice.org contributor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
