Yes, that's true. I though about using the cookie field, but I want to leave that open for a future use. My main concern is that it goes against the OpenFlow protocol.

- Derek

On 02/18/2011 12:05 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
What about flow cookies?  They're 64-bit identifiers that exist in both the 
Flow Mod and Flow Removed messages.

--Justin


On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:

Sure, let me explain the problem. I am maintaining a copy of the flows in 
memory outside of the controller (Nox). When a flow is removed, I need to 
remove it from the stored flows. However, if the wildcards are not exact in the 
removed message, I cannot identify exactly which flow it is. I could have a 
flow with those extra fields set to 0 and I would think it's that flow being 
deleted, when it's really a different one.

Thanks,
- Derek

On 02/18/2011 11:40 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
Hi, Derek.  I just wanted to let you know that we're still discussing how to 
best handle this.  How difficult is it from your perspective if OVS continued 
to behave in this manner?  There was a time when this normalization was more 
important from a performance perspective than it is now, so we may be able to 
either stop normalizing or at least store the original wildcards.  However, OVS 
has behaved this way for a long time, and we haven't heard other application 
writers have issues with it.  I understand how it could be confusing, though.

--Justin


On Feb 16, 2011, at 1:39 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:

Okay, that makes a bit more sense.  My guess is that if you look in ovs-vswitchd's logs, 
you'll see some messages about "normalization changed ofp_match".  Internally, 
we're clearing those other wildcard bits, since they're meaningless for non-IP/ARP flows 
(such as your flow definition with ethertype of 5).  I'll talk with Ben about how we want 
to handle this from an OpenFlow-compatiblity standpoint tomorrow.

--Justin


On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Derek Cormier wrote:

Great. I also made a mistake about the field. It was dl_type, not dl_src. It 
actually works fine for dl_src.

- Derek

On 02/16/2011 05:36 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
No problem.  Most of us are subscribed to both.  :-)  We'll take a look at it 
in the morning, California time.  I don't expect it will be a difficult fix.

Thanks for reporting it.

--Justin


On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Derek Cormier wrote:

Now that I think about it, this should have been posted to the dev board. Sorry 
about that!

- Derek

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org





_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org

Reply via email to