Hi Jesse, Ok. Sorry about that. I will read about KVM, Xen that you suggested, and then get back. Thanks for your help.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jesse Gross <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Aishwarya <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jesse, > > > > By one instance of OVS, do you mean I should only create one bridge, or > one instance of vswitchd? Right now, I am creating only one instance of > vswitchd on the host, but 2 bridges, one on the host for the containers to > communicate to the.host and the other inside the container so that the vms > can be attached to that one. Creating the second bridge is where I am facing > an issue with the previous error. Seems like you are saying this is not > needed. Is that correct? I will look at KVM for more information. > > > > I could successfully set up UML to UML communication without containers > on a host. It's confusing because now the UMLs are created within the > container. So, I am just wondering how the UMLs will use OVS to communicate > if They cannot be attached to thr bridge because of the connection error. > > You're asking why a process running inside of a container is not able > to make changes to something running in the root container? Please > take a minute to think about the purpose of containers and what I have > already told you. You should be able to answer this question > yourself. > > You have been asked several times to do some basic research and > thinking before posting questions, which you seem unwilling or unable > to do. Until that changes, I'm not interested in continuing this > endless dialog. >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
