Yes, although it would be better to find a way to avoid the loop in the first place.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Guangvy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jesse, > Thanks for your help. > Can STP avoid this loop? > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "Jesse Gross"<[email protected]>; > Date: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 10:13 AM > To: "Guangvy"<[email protected]>; > Cc: "discuss"<[email protected]>; > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] issue of vxlan inner packet > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Guangvy <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi >> Given that there are OVS1 and OVS2, two VXLAN between these, >> VXLAN1000 and VXLAN2000 belong to same Bridge. >> OVS1 send a packet through VXLAN1000, then VXLAN2000 of OVS2 will forward >> it >> once VXLAN1000 receive the packet. >> So OVS1 will also receive the packet, next VXLAN1000 of OVS1 send it >> again. >> The packet will continuously send between OVSs. > > Yes, you have created a loop. You need to segment it somehow but the > VNI does not automatically do that. > . _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
