On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Rui Vaz wrote: > I read this article about sFlow versus NetFlow and it states that: > > With sFlow monitoring, the *decode*, *hash*, *flow cache* and > *flush*functionality are not implemented on the switch. > > With NetFlow this operations are performed in the switch, moreover there's > a flowcache (which can be configure to a minimum of 30 seconds). This > results in a delay from the moment the packets > cross the switch until they are flushed to the monitoring tool. > > Is this true in the Open vSwitch implementation?
Yes. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
