On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:16:50AM -0700, Keith Holleman wrote: > Dang, so I take it from the nature of the patch that what you are doing is > failing the second add of the duplicate tunnel. This requires the user of > OVS to manage any duplicate tunnel usage in some other layer and handle > tracking the reference/users. Is that correct? Perfectly reasonable > solution but I love when someone else solves my problems :-)
Suppose we decided to support duplicate tunnels. Then, which one of the set of duplicates is the ingress port for a packet received on the tunnel? I don't know a reasonable answer. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
