On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:46:24PM +0800, Zang MingJie wrote: > From document: > > To connect one logical router to another. This requires > a pair of logical router ports, each connected to a dif‐ > ferent router. Each router port in the pair specifies > the other in its peer column. No Logical_Switch refers > to the router port. > > In my understanding, it connect two routers, and merge there routing table. > eg, if there are two routers: > > r1 attached to net1 and net2 > r2 attached to net3 and net4 > > if I connect r1 and r2, then the four networks are all connect. > > But what if I create a single route with all four network attach to it ? > > Is there any different between these two scenario ? is there any benefit of > using two routers ?
Many scenarios can be implemented either way. The benefit is to allow a network to be modeled in the way preferred by the user. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss