I've obtained a little more information from a conversation on Twitter with Xiang Li, a CoreOS developer, see below.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:14:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > This leaves me with the following discussion questions: > > - Is lack of non-amd64 support a blocker? It's going to suck for > me, because I do my development on i386 specifically to introduce > diversity (I find bugs that others don't because they're all on > amd64). Also, we've lately had people actually making sure that > the testsuite passes on non-x86-64, so there seems to be real > interest there. Xiang says that to support non-x86-64 architectures, they would need someone to take responsibility for maintaining them. I still don't know whether this is a blocker. > - Can etcd handle big transactions? Xiang says that there's a 1 MB limit on transactions by default, which can be increased. This is probably not a blocker. > - Can etcd handle a sufficient number of notify registrations? Xiang says that etcd can handle at least a million notify registrations. This is probably not a blocker. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
