Sorry for not explaining, I added the field and it's works really fine, but just I did some modification on classifier_lookup__() especially the function "find_match_wc()" and i just want to know how the OvS find the rules ? so if you could explain to me about the function "find_match_wc()" because I need to explaining to them everything about the process of finding a rule. Thank you and have a nice day.
2016-08-11 22:44 GMT+02:00 Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>: > Now I'm confused. First, you said that you're adding a new field and > found a problem. Now, you said that you're trying to explain how > classifier_lookup__() works for a presentation. Which of these is > really true? > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:27:43PM +0200, Amrane Ait Zeouay wrote: > > I want just to understand how the function classifier_lookup__() works. > > Because i have the presentation and i need to explain to them about it, > and > > i read your documents but there is nothing how this function works. I > found > > that if there is no wildcard then it will go from the first condition in > > the function find_match_wc() and the other i didn't understand them. > > So can you please explain to me briefly about it. > > Thank you and have a nice day. > > On 11 Aug 2016 18:20, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You're doing something wrong. The classifier finds a matching rule. > > > There's no need to "check" anything afterward. > > > > > > The classifier doesn't have any provision for finding a "different" > > > rule. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Amrane Ait Zeouay wrote: > > > > No, I'm working with classifier to find the rule. So when the > classifier > > > > found the rule I need to check that rule. But the problem is when i > want > > > > the classifier to give me another rule different from the highest > rule > > > that > > > > matches the flow. > > > > Thank you. > > > > On 11 Aug 2016 5:45 pm, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:14:38PM +0200, Amrane Ait Zeouay wrote: > > > > > > I'm working on Openvswitch version 2.5.0 for adding new fields, > And I > > > > > found > > > > > > a problem with my implemntation in the function "find_match_wc()" > > > file > > > > > > lib/classifier.c, I want to know when the condition > > > "OVS_UNLIKELY(!wc)" > > > > > is > > > > > > used, and this condition too "!cmap_node_next(inode)" and the > last > > > one > > > > > for > > > > > > looking for a rule using find_match(), because one time it was > going > > > from > > > > > > "OVS_UNLIKELY(!wc)" and another time it went from > > > > > "!cmap_node_next(inode)" > > > > > > and this time is skipping everything and going for that > > > "finding_match()" > > > > > > > > > > You don't need to modify the classifier code to add a new field. > > > > > > > > > -- Amrane Ait Zeouay Engineer Student in The Development of Software and Systems University of Western Brittany Tel: +33 7 62 25 56 03 <+33+7+62+25+56+03>
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
