On 6/8/06, Jerome Louvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Is there a reason this limitation was added? Wouldn't it be better to
> change getValues() to e.g., getValuesString() and add a ParameterList
> getValues (name) method?
The method was renamed to "subList(String name)", following the List API
code style. If you just really need a list of strings, then we need to add
another method indeed. Let me know.
Doh! I missed that completey. Sorry for the confusion.
Returning the ParameterList is just fine by me.
Thanks,
John
