The Restlet project sort of gives the message (by the example of restlet.orgetc.) that Simple is the best thing to run Restlet servers on top of, when -- at least in my opinion -- in fact it's really not. The Simple project seems kind of unresponsive to Restlet's needs. So maybe it's time for a change of message. Just sayin'.
On 1/10/08, Kevin Conaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This has been done several times in their mailing list already. Apparently > > it requires some internal redesign > > > > I saw the posts a month or so ago when I was writing the connectors for > the test cases and I couldn't figure out why the Simple connector kept > getting "address in use" SocketExceptions. > > I'm shocked that a web server was designed without a way to shutdown and > I'm shocked that its been over a year (at least) and nothing has been done > about it.
