Sure, I'll do that. Thanks! Avi
On 2/14/08, Jerome Louvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Avi, > > I agree with you for this property, at least for the Client class. I'm not > sure about the change on Request. I don't want to give to much control on > the Connectors to Applications contained in a Component. > > We also have connectors like JDBC where I'm not sure if we'll be able to > take advantage of it. We can just ignore the property in this case. > > Do you want to propose patch or at least enter a RFE? > > Best regards, > Jerome > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Avi Flax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Envoyé : mercredi 13 février 2008 18:58 > > À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org > > Objet : Re: Client Timeout > > > > > Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I was just thinking about > > this... I think it might be useful if both Client and Request had a > > setConnectTimeout() method. This seems to me like a very general and > > very useful parameter, one which deserves API support, instead of > > being buried in connector parameters. > > > > The Client's connect timeout could be used as the default for all > > requests made by that Client, which could be overridden for a given > > Request by calling setConnectTimeout() for the Request. > > > > Or am I missing something? > > > > Thanks, > > Avi > > -- Avi Flax » Partner » Arc90 » http://arc90.com
