Hi Paul, > Well, at least update the Javadoc so it specifically says that the > strings returned are not decoded.
Actually, there is already a paragraph on this in the Javadocs (1.1 M2) at the class level, but not for each getter. I have just added a note to each getter returning encoded strings. > > Now, maybe we could add getDecodedPath() and similar > methods, but it might crop the class. Any thought? > > I think there's a language barrier here. I don't know what "crop" > means in this context. Sorry for the bad wording, I meant that it might 'clutter' the class to add "getDecoded***()" methods. Best regards, Jerome