Hi Paul,

> Well, at least update the Javadoc so it specifically says that the  
> strings returned are not decoded.

Actually, there is already a paragraph on this in the Javadocs (1.1 M2) at
the class level, but not for each getter. I have just added a note to each
getter returning encoded strings.

> > Now, maybe we could add getDecodedPath() and similar 
> methods, but it might crop the class. Any thought?
> 
> I think there's a language barrier here.  I don't know what "crop"  
> means in this context.

Sorry for the bad wording, I meant that it might 'clutter' the class to add
"getDecoded***()" methods.

Best regards,
Jerome  

Reply via email to