Hi Thierry,
thanks for your quick reply,
Thierry Boileau a écrit :
> Hello Laurent,
>
> the router class which is in charge to dispatch a call between the
> declared routes relies on a parameter called "routingMode". It can take
> on of these values: best, first, last, custom, next and random.
> By default, its routing mode is "best". Each declared route is defined a
> score, according to the path of the incoming request, and the length of
> the recognized characters.
> In your case, both "/users/{id}" and "/users/identification-keys" give
> the same score because they catch the same number of cracters, thus the
> first declared route giving the best score is chosen.
> So I'm enclined to say that the declaration order is not neutral using
> the default routing mode, and thus it is preferable to declared the
> routes without pattern before the ones using patterns (such as /users/{id}).
Ok, all clear, it is what I was guessing.
>
> We may enhance the "best" algorithm by promoting the routes having the
> best score but without a pattern. This question is open.
>
> Regarding the 405 response, I suppose the "UserResource.class " does not
> "implement the GET method" ie does not use the @Get annotation nor
> implement the ServerResource#get(Variant) method, nor the
> ServerResource#get() method . Could you tell us more about this point?
I am trying to POST to the resource '/users/identification-keys', and
the associated class have method with annotations to handle post :
@Post
public Representation createIdentificationKey(Representation
entity) throws ResourceException {...}
But It is true that it does not have any method for GET, with
annotations or not.
Regards,
Laurent.
>
>
>> Another question, should I attach route using a trailing slash in URI, or
>> not, or should I declare two routes ?
> I think that attaching "/users" works for both cases (requesting "/users" and
> "/users/"), so to my taste, it is useless to declare the "/users/" route.
> Some purists can consider that "/users/" expresses that this resource is a
> kind of directory, a container of other resources.
>
> best regards,
> Thierry Boileau
>
>> Hello,
>> I have a question about route and router.
>> I have the following router
>> final Router router = new Router(getContext());
>> router.attach("/users", UsersResource.class);
>> router.attach("/users/{id}", UserResource.class);
>> router.attach("/users/identification-keys",
>> IdentificationKeysResource.class);
>>
>> return router;
>>
>> If I go to http://localhost/users/identification-keys I got a 405 error
>> in return
>> If I declare the last line first, like this
>>
>> final Router router = new Router(getContext());
>> router.attach("/users/identification-keys",
>> IdentificationKeysResource.class);
>> router.attach("/users", UsersResource.class);
>> router.attach("/users/{id}", UserResource.class);
>> return router;
>>
>> then it works.
>> I tried to change behavior of router using
>> router.setDefaultMatchingMode(Template.MODE_EQUALS);
>> but nothing seems to changed.
>> Is it possibly something not correct in my resource class ?
>> Right now, it's ok for me to declare in the second way my resource, but
>> I think it should work also in the first way,
>> as shown by the tutorial
>> http://www.restlet.org/documentation/2.0/tutorial#part12
>>
>> Another question, should I attach route using a trailing slash in URI,
>> or not, or should I declare two routes ?
>> router.attach("/users", UsersResource.class);
>> router.attach("/users/", UsersResource.class);
>> Regards,
>> Laurent.
>>
>> P.S: using restlet 2.0 M4
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2382106
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files attached may contain
> confidential and proprietary information of Alcatel-Lucent and/or its
> affiliated entities. Access by the intended recipient only is authorized. Any
> liability arising from any party acting, or refraining from acting, on any
> information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, destroy the
> original transmission and its attachments and do not disclose the contents to
> any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in
> any medium. Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments belongs to
> Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities.
>
>
--
Laurent Rustuel,
Alten contractor for Alcatel-Lucent, Brest
------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2382340
