As long as you're part of the decision-making process for Restlet, then I'm OK with it.
> The caveat is that people don't always understand how to use the > configuration parameters of ThreadPoolExecutor. There was an exchange > on the concurrency-interest mailing list recently that brought this > home to me. For example, it seems that a lot of people think of > corePoolSize as minPoolSize, the opposite of maxPoolSize, which is the > wrong way to think about it. A conservative default in Restlet is > probably better than a user configuration based on a misunderstanding. > > --tim ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2628698
