Hello Robert, Ioanis, did you try to use the "simple" or "jetty" extensions? They provide a HTTP server connector that we consider to be more stable than the internal HTTP connector which is fine for development but not for production systems. We are on the way to provide a good one with the 2.1 release. I guess the same question applies for the client application : you can use the "net" or the "httpclient" extensions. We consider also that these extensions provide a more stable client connector than the internal one.
Best regards, Thierry Boileau Yes it was. I let Restlet do all the heavy resource lifting and made sure > my domain logic was as clean as possible. I do not recall a single instance > where I had to explicitly clean up something belonging to Restlet. > > >> Hi Robert, neat project you have going on there. I will answer a tiny > part > >> of your question, I've load tested 2.1-RC5 heavily and after careful > tweaking > >> I've yet to reach the worker limit scenario you detail here. > >> > >> My setup is: 150 maxThreads, 10 minThreads, 145 lowThreads, maxQueued 20 > >> but ofc YMMV. > > > > Thanks for the reply Ioannis. So did the careful tweaking you did come > down to just those parameters above? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2977064 > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2977951 > ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2983229
